# Excerpts of Post-Belt and Road Forum for International Cooperation Wrap-Up Interview with Minister Lawrence Wong in Beijing on 16 May 2017

- **Source:** Ministry of National Development
- **Published:** 2017-05-16T04:30:00.000Z
- **Author:** Ministry of National Development
- **Original:** https://www.mnd.gov.sg/newsroom/press-releases/view/excerpts-of-post-belt-and-road-forum-for-international-cooperation-wrap-up-interview-with-minister-lawrence-wong-in-beijing-on-16-may-2017
- **Topics:** Investment & Capital Markets, Regional Markets

## Featured rationale

Singapore’s financing, urban-planning and professional-services role could support more regional infrastructure and development transactions, potentially creating overseas opportunities for Singapore-based property and infrastructure companies.

## AI summary

Singapore supported Belt and Road infrastructure cooperation, with 60% of ASEAN projects financed through Singapore and about 30% of Chinese outbound Belt and Road investment routed there.

## Original article

Minister: We see the Belt and Road as potentially the world’s largest platform for regional cooperation and integration. It will provide a boost to trade, connectivity and infrastructure development. From Singapore’s point of view, the message that I have been giving to the Chinese leaders and other partners whom we have met here at the Belt and Road Forum is that Singapore supports the Belt and Road, and we stand ready to work with China and other countries to help build the Belt and Road.

We think we can add value in several ways. Firstly, on the financial side, there are tremendous needs for the financing of projects. No single country can fully finance the infrastructure projects on the Belt and Road, not even the multilateral banks. So you really need to bring in private capital and commercial financing, and Singapore is a financing centre and we can play a useful role. 

In fact, if you look at the projects in ASEAN, already 60 per cent of these projects have their financing done though Singapore, and that is because we have one of the highest concentration of project finance in Asia. 

The second way we can play a useful role is in infrastructure and urban planning, because many countries along the Belt and Road, particularly in Southeast Asia, are going through rapid urbanisation and they are looking for expertise to help them in the process. This can be a complex process – if not done properly, it can be very expensive because you end up duplicating things, or putting in investments that cannot yield results. 

So countries understand that if this is not done well, or if you do not prepare early enough, rural poverty can lead to urban poverty. Countries are looking for assistance and many of them have come to Singapore to study what has been our experience in 50 years of very rapid modernisation. We are happy to share our experience, and we can help other countries develop their own urban masterplans, and then help them successfully implement infrastructure projects to meet their own needs. 

Thirdly, we see scope for Singaporean companies to work with Chinese companies as they go out, because China is encouraging its companies to go out of China as part of the Belt and Road initiative, and at the same time, we are also encouraging our companies to internationalise. 

In this recent Budget, we gave a further push with more incentives and more assistance to help our companies go regional. We think that there is a lot of scope for Singaporean and Chinese companies to come together. We have complementary strengths. The Chinese companies in areas like utilities, transport, rail, infrastructure, are larger, and have the resources. But if they embark on projects within Southeast Asia, they may not have the local knowledge, they may not have all the areas of expertise that they need, whereas Singaporean companies may be more familiar with the local conditions, they have the business network, they have the abilities to manage these projects. I think the combination of China and Singaporean companies coming together in third markets, particularly in Southeast Asia, can be another area of cooperation. 

These are some areas which we think Singapore can be relevant, can add value to the Belt and Road, and we will continue to work with China and other countries on these different areas of cooperation. 

Qn: Singapore also signed an MOU regarding the Belt and Road, could you give us more details on the MOU?

Minister: The MOU covers areas that I mentioned earlier – financial cooperation, infrastructure, companies coming together to work in third markets, and it also includes our project in Chongqing. 

The project we have in Chongqing is an important priority platform to demonstrate and operationalise the Belt and Road initiative. Both sides are now working on this Southern Transport Corridor as you all are familiar with – it links Chongqing with Beibuwan in Guangxi. Chongqing is tied to the Belt which goes to Central Asia and Europe, and Beibuwan, Guangxi is tied to the Maritime Silk Road. If we connect the two – Chongqing to Beibuwan – we can then effectively connect the Belt and Road. That would make the Belt and Road much more effectively; it would enhance connectivity and it would add benefits to many people in the region. 

Qn: Could you give us your impression of your attendance at the Forum? What is your sense seeing the discussions going on – the atmosphere, the international cooperation?

Minister: Clearly, it is a very important forum for China. Like I mentioned earlier, it is a very major platform, not only for China, but for cooperation for the whole world. There was very active participation, and a lot of interest from countries to get involved in the Belt and Road projects, particularly the developing countries that have huge infrastructure needs. 

China is pushing the Belt and Road to advance trade and connectivity. So, there’s tremendous interest in countries to be involved in the Belt and Road initiative in order to accelerate their infrastructure projects. If you look at the participation at the Forum, it is very wide-spread – there are African countries, Middle-Eastern countries, Central Asian countries. Many of these countries certainly hope to benefit from the Belt and Road initiative.

Qn: When the concept was brought up in 2013, some countries had scepticism. From the Forum, did you sense more confidence in the concept?

Minister: This is a vision that will take a long time to be fully realised, but over the last few years since the Belt and Road initiative was mooted, you have seen more resources being put on the table, you have seen actual projects being realised. As more and more of these come into play, people will see that it’s not just talk, it’s action, it’s concrete, it’s tangible results. 

But as I have mentioned earlier, this is not something that can be done by China alone. China has mooted the initiative, and President Xi has said very clearly that it’s not a Chinese platform, but an international platform for cooperation. And financing as he said too, is the key. He mentioned that finance is the lifeblood of modern economy, and financing is the key to ensuring the success of the Belt and Road initiative. To ensure successful financing of the projects, it is important that these projects are done on a commercial basis, that you attract private capital so that you make more funding available to the projects.

So we must find ways to manage the risks that are inherent in these projects, because they are complex. If you have a rail project, it may cut across different jurisdictions; if there is a change of government, then what happens; if there is a termination by any one party, what happens? What are the termination clauses? How do you allocate risks under these circumstances? 

These are not trivial issues. It is precisely this type of complexity that makes it difficult for these projects to get financing. Through the Belt and Road initiative, we can work through some of these operational issues. I think it will help bring down the risks involved in these infrastructure projects. The more we can do that, the more we can attract private capital, and that will lead to more projects been funded.

Qn: A lot of these big infrastructure projects, because of all the risks that you have mentioned, it is very hard for private entities to want to be part of it, therefore governments and multilateral banks have to come in to fund these projects. Trying to get the commercial sector to be involved, how realistic is it?

Minister: We can take incremental steps towards making it happen, and it is already happening now. You have multilateral banks, like the World Bank, that have been very active in doing this. 

What they have done is work out mechanisms to de-risk projects, for example, through a first-loss guarantee. They work with different parties, they work with governments, and they provide a guarantee. If there is a loss, if there is a breach or non-payment, then they are the ones who guarantee the first loss. Because it’s the World Bank behind it, the governments are also very cautious, because they know if they default on payment, it’s not just this project at stake, there can be many other World Bank loans at stake. 

So the World Bank does its due diligence, and crowds in private sector funding for such projects. It is already happening at that level, and I think that’s one good way which we can start make things happen. 

That’s why for the Belt and Road, the Chinese have said they are very keen to work with multilateral banks, including the World Bank and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB). The AIIB has just started, it’s fairly new, it’s got seven or nine projects so far, but it hopes to expand its portfolio, and it’s certainly looking to see how it can do more in project preparation, project structuring, and work with different parties to help de-risk the projects. 

I believe with the World Bank and AIIB’s involvement, you can see more of these happening over time. We are keen to work with the multilateral banks. We have the World Bank office in Singapore – their infrastructure hub is based in Singapore. We have been talking to the AIIB to see what more we can do together. Within Singapore itself, we hope we can provide, as I have said, a financial and infrastructure hub, not just for the commercial banks, but also for the multilateral banks.

Qn: Singapore companies are known to be very realistic, some countries may be afraid of the Belt and Road projects, worrying that there are strategical and political considerations. Do you think that when Chinese companies tie up with Singaporean companies, it is a stamp to say that it is commercially viable and put a stake in it?

Minister: I can’t speak for Chinese companies what their considerations are. Our own companies will look at the rate-of-return, they will look at risks, they will make their own considerations. 

For us, our basis of operation is very clear, the government will provide the framework; we will even provide facilitation and link-up, but companies make their own decisions. The companies ought to be able to make their own calculations, if they want to go into a project, go in with their eyes open, understand who their partners are, and make their calculations of risk and returns and see if that’s something they would want to do. 

This is already happening. We see more and more Singaporean companies going overseas – on power projects, utilities projects, water, infrastructure, etc. If there’s scope to partner with Chinese companies, and I think there is, we will encourage them to do so. 

Qn: Could you say something about Singapore having this international arbitration centre, and whether we can provide arbitration services for companies in dispute.

Minister: This is another key part which I mentioned, besides finance, that will enable us to serve as an infrastructure exchange. The fact is that we have a whole range of professional services which includes dispute resolution, legal advisory, and arbitration. Precisely because infrastructure projects are so complex, a key is the arbitration mechanism when there are disputes. So the arbitration centre we have in Singapore will help play a useful role. The legal services will help, the dispute resolution services we have in Singapore will help. All of that we have as a comprehensive suite of solutions in Singapore. That’s why we can be the exchange where different parts of the infrastructure value chain come together, and the projects and deals can be done through Singapore – because the financing can be done through Singapore, the solutions can be done in Singapore, and the legal and arbitration and dispute resolution mechanism can be settled out of Singapore. 

Qn: How do we then promote ourselves? Are there any challenges in trying to convince partners of the Belt and Road to use Singapore as an exchange? 

Minister: How do we make ourselves relevant? This is a continuing challenge. We shouldn’t be complacent; we shouldn’t assume that everybody will come to Singapore naturally. 

There’s no reason why they need to. They can go to Hong Kong; they may even do it out of China over time. We shouldn’t assume just because we are in a good position today that all these will come automatically. 

Our imperative for Singapore, for the government and the companies, is to work hard and make ourselves more attractive and relevant. And this is what we have been doing all this while.

In the 1980s, after the Plaza Accord when the Japanese investment came out of Japan and invested in Southeast Asia, we worked hard to attract them – to make ourselves relevant and make ourselves a good base for them to locate their manufacturing bases and Southeast Asian branches. 

So likewise, when Chinese companies go out of China as part of the Belt and Road initiative, we have to make ourselves attractive to outbound Chinese investments. 

We are doing a credible job now, it’s not as though we are irrelevant, because if you look at Chinese outbound investments in the Belt and Road, the (PRC) Ministry of Commerce statistics shows that we are getting about 30 per cent of that – not because we have infrastructure projects in Singapore, but because these are investments coming to Singapore and then eventually being channelled to third countries in Asia, because we are a relevant financial centre. 

So, we are not doing too badly. But we shouldn’t be complacent either. 30 per cent can come down if we are complacent, and other competing hubs emerge to take the business away from us. We have to work hard, on the financial side, on the professional services side, on the infrastructure side as well as to attract Chinese companies to use Singapore as a base. That’s something the government will have to do, and we will encourage Singaporean companies themselves to see how they can add value as partners to the Chinese companies. 

Qn: Are there any Singaporean companies at the Forum?

Minister: Yes, there are. They already have partnerships with Chinese companies. Our infrastructure players, our utilities players can benefit, and many of them already have Chinese partnerships and we encourage them to continue to strengthen these partnerships. The key to doing that is to be relevant – our companies need to work hard and be more innovative, to add value and show that they can offer good value propositions to Chinese companies when they come together in partnership.

Qn: Could you talk about the competition as other parts of the world get developed into transportation hub, infrastructure hub which used to be the advantage of Singapore?

Minister: We shouldn’t be afraid of the competition. We should take it in our stride. Singapore could have very well failed, if we had not put certain things right. But we were able to overcome the difficulties throughout our history. That should give us the confidence that we can face the competition ahead in the future. We shouldn’t be afraid of it; we should be confident of our own abilities and of our own resourcefulness and innovativeness. Already if you look at our plans, we are putting in significant additional investment to expand our airport and sea port. We are doubling our airport, literally building another Changi Airport; we are doubling the capacity of our sea port; and this will make our two ports – sea and air ports, much more relevant in the future.

We are making Singapore not just an air and sea hub, but also a digital hub. If you look at the future, digital data will be the new asset. People liken it to new oil. Just as we are an oil hub even though we have no oil resources, in the future we want to be a data hub, a digital hub. That’s why we are also putting in infrastructure to enhance our ICT infrastructure – our links to other countries through submarine cables, and our own internal infrastructure for a Smart Nation.

We are not standing still and we cannot afford to stand still. There is competition. But we should take it in our stride, we should be confident, we should continue all of these efforts to ensure that we are able to have a secure future ahead of us. Many of these things have been discussed by the Committee on the Future Economy (CFE), and we are now following through on the recommendations.

## Chinese translation

> Translation model: grok_cli

### 2017年5月16日黄循财部长在北京“一带一路”国际合作高峰论坛后总结访谈节录

部长：我们将“一带一路”视为潜在的全球最大区域合作与一体化平台。它将为贸易、互联互通与基础设施建设提供动力。从新加坡的角度，我向在此“一带一路”论坛上会面的中国领导人及其他伙伴传递的信息是：新加坡支持“一带一路”，我们已准备好与中国及其他国家合作，助力共建“一带一路”。

我们认为我们可以在几个方面增加价值。首先，在金融方面，项目融资需求巨大。没有任何一个国家能够完全为“一带一路”上的基础设施项目提供融资，即使是多边银行也不行。因此，确实需要引入私人资本与商业融资，而新加坡是融资中心，我们可以发挥有用的作用。

事实上，如果你看东盟的项目，已经有60%的这些项目是通过新加坡完成融资的，这是因为我们拥有亚洲项目融资最集中的市场之一。

我们能发挥有用作用的第二种方式是基础设施与城市规划，因为“一带一路”沿线许多国家，尤其是东南亚，正在经历快速城市化，它们在寻求专业知识帮助其完成这一进程。这可能是一个复杂的过程——如果处理不当，可能非常昂贵，因为最终会重复建设，或投入无法产生成果的投资。

因此，各国明白，如果这件事做得不好，或者没有及早准备，农村贫困可能转化为城市贫困。各国正在寻求协助，其中许多国家来到新加坡，研究我们在50年非常快速现代化中的经验。我们乐于分享我们的经验，我们可以帮助其他国家制定各自的城市总体规划，然后帮助它们成功实施满足自身需求的基础设施项目。

第三，我们看到新加坡公司与中国公司在“走出去”时合作的空间，因为中国正鼓励其企业作为“一带一路”倡议的一部分走出国门，与此同时，我们也在鼓励我们的企业国际化。

在最近的预算案中，我们进一步加大力度，提供更多激励与更多协助，帮助我们的企业走向区域。我们认为新加坡与中国公司携手合作的空间很大。我们拥有互补优势。中国公司在公用事业、交通、铁路、基础设施等领域规模更大，资源更充足。但如果它们在东南亚开展项目，可能不具备本地知识，也可能不具备所需的全部专业领域，而新加坡公司可能更熟悉本地情况，拥有商业网络，具备管理这些项目的能力。我认为中国与新加坡公司在第三市场、尤其是东南亚携手合作，可以是另一个合作领域。

这些是我们认为新加坡可以发挥作用、能为“一带一路”增加价值的一些领域，我们将继续与中国及其他国家在这些不同合作领域开展工作。

问：新加坡还签署了有关“一带一路”的谅解备忘录，您能否给我们更多关于该谅解备忘录的细节？

部长：该谅解备忘录涵盖我前面提到的领域——金融合作、基础设施、企业携手在第三市场开展工作，也包括我们在重庆的项目。

我们在重庆的项目是展示并落实“一带一路”倡议的重要优先平台。双方目前正在推进大家所熟悉的“南向通道”——它连接重庆与广西北部湾。重庆与通往中亚和欧洲的“带”相连，而广西北部湾与海上丝绸之路相连。如果我们把两者连接起来——从重庆到北部湾——我们就能有效地把“一带”和“一路”连接起来。这将使“一带一路”更加有效；它将增强互联互通，并为该地区许多人带来利益。

问：您能否谈谈您对出席此次论坛的印象？您对正在进行的讨论——氛围、国际合作——有何感受？

部长：显然，这对中国来说是一个非常重要的论坛。正如我前面提到的，它不仅是一个非常重大的中国平台，也是全世界合作的平台。参与非常积极，各国对参与“一带一路”项目兴趣浓厚，尤其是基础设施需求巨大的发展中国家。

中国推动“一带一路”是为了促进贸易与互联互通。因此，各国对参与“一带一路”倡议以加快其基础设施项目有着极大兴趣。如果你看论坛的参与情况，范围非常广泛——有非洲国家、中东国家、中亚国家。这些国家中许多当然希望从“一带一路”倡议中受益。

问：当这一理念在2013年提出时，一些国家持怀疑态度。从论坛上，您是否感受到对这一理念更有信心？

部长：这是一个需要很长时间才能充分实现的愿景，但自“一带一路”倡议提出以来的过去几年，你已经看到更多资源被摆上桌面，你已经看到实际项目得以实现。随着越来越多这样的成果落地，人们会看到这不只是空谈，而是行动，是具体的、有形的成果。

但正如我前面提到的，这不是中国可以单独完成的事情。中国提出了这一倡议，习近平主席也非常明确地表示，这不是一个中国平台，而是一个国际合作平台。正如他所说，融资是关键。他提到，金融是现代经济的血液，融资是确保“一带一路”倡议成功的关键。为确保项目成功融资，重要的是这些项目按商业基础推进，吸引私人资本，从而为项目提供更多资金。

因此，我们必须找到方法管理这些项目固有的风险，因为它们很复杂。如果你有一个铁路项目，它可能跨越不同司法管辖区；如果政府更迭，那会怎样；如果任何一方终止，那会怎样？终止条款是什么？在这些情况下如何分配风险？

这些都不是无关紧要的问题。正是这类复杂性使这些项目难以获得融资。通过“一带一路”倡议，我们可以解决其中一些操作问题。我认为这将有助于降低这些基础设施项目所涉及的风险。我们越能做到这一点，就越能吸引私人资本，从而有更多项目获得资金支持。

问：许多这类大型基础设施项目，由于您提到的种种风险，私人实体很难愿意参与，因此政府与多边银行不得不介入为这些项目提供资金。试图让商业部门参与，这有多现实？

部长：我们可以采取渐进步骤使之实现，而且现在已经在发生。多边银行，如世界银行，在这方面一直非常积极。

它们所做的是制定降低项目风险的机制，例如通过首损担保。它们与不同各方合作，与政府合作，并提供担保。如果发生损失，如果发生违约或不付款，则由它们担保首损。因为有世界银行在背后，政府也会非常谨慎，因为它们知道如果违约不付款，不仅这个项目受影响，还可能牵涉许多其他世界银行贷款。

因此，世界银行进行尽职调查，并为这类项目引入私营部门资金。这在那个层面已经在发生，我认为这是我们可以开始让事情发生的一个好方法。

这就是为什么对于“一带一路”，中方表示非常希望与多边银行合作，包括世界银行和亚洲基础设施投资银行（亚投行）。亚投行刚刚起步，还相当新，目前大约有七个或九个项目，但它希望扩大其项目组合，并且肯定在研究如何在项目准备、项目结构设计方面做得更多，并与不同各方合作帮助降低项目风险。

我相信随着世界银行和亚投行的参与，你可以看到随着时间推移会有更多这样的事情发生。我们希望与多边银行合作。我们在新加坡设有世界银行办事处——其基础设施中心设在新加坡。我们一直在与亚投行讨论可以共同做更多什么。在新加坡国内，我们希望能够提供，正如我所说，一个金融与基础设施中心，不仅面向商业银行，也面向多边银行。

问：新加坡公司以非常务实著称，一些国家可能对“一带一路”项目心存顾虑，担心存在战略与政治考量。您是否认为当中国公司与新加坡公司合作时，这是一个表明项目具有商业可行性并为此下注的印记？

部长：我不能替中国公司说它们的考量是什么。我们自己的公司会看回报率，会看风险，会作出自己的考量。

对我们而言，我们的运作基础非常明确，政府将提供框架；我们甚至会提供便利与对接，但公司自己做决定。公司应当能够作出自己的计算，如果它们想进入某个项目，就应睁大眼睛进入，了解合作伙伴是谁，并计算风险与回报，看那是否是它们想做的事。

这已经在发生。我们看到越来越多新加坡公司走向海外——电力项目、公用事业项目、水务、基础设施等。如果有与中国公司合作的空间，我认为是有的，我们会鼓励它们这样做。

问：您能否谈谈新加坡拥有这个国际仲裁中心，以及我们是否能为发生争议的公司提供仲裁服务。

部长：这是我提到的除金融之外的另一个关键部分，它将使我们能够作为基础设施交易平台发挥作用。事实是，我们拥有一整套专业服务，包括争议解决、法律咨询和仲裁。正是因为基础设施项目如此复杂，关键是在发生争议时有仲裁机制。因此，我们在新加坡的仲裁中心将有助于发挥有用作用。法律服务将有帮助，我们在新加坡拥有的争议解决服务将有帮助。所有这些我们都作为新加坡的一整套全面解决方案拥有。这就是为什么我们可以成为基础设施价值链不同环节汇聚的交易平台，项目与交易可以通过新加坡完成——因为融资可以通过新加坡完成，解决方案可以在新加坡完成，法律与仲裁及争议解决机制也可以在新加坡解决。

问：那我们如何推广自己？在试图说服“一带一路”伙伴使用新加坡作为交易平台方面是否有挑战？

部长：我们如何让自己保持相关性？这是一个持续的挑战。我们不应自满；我们不应假设每个人都会自然而然地来到新加坡。

它们没有理由必须这样做。它们可以去香港；随着时间推移，它们甚至可能在中国境内完成。我们不应假设仅仅因为我们今天处于有利位置，所有这些就会自动到来。

对我们新加坡、对政府和企业而言，当务之急是努力工作，使自己更具吸引力和相关性。而这正是我们一直在做的。

在1980年代，广场协议之后，当日本投资走出日本并投资东南亚时，我们努力吸引它们——使我们自己具有相关性，并成为一个让它们设立制造基地和东南亚分支机构的良好基地。

同样，当中国企业作为“一带一路”倡议的一部分走出国门时，我们必须使自己对出境中国投资具有吸引力。

我们现在做得相当不错，并不是说我们无关紧要，因为如果你看“一带一路”上的中国出境投资，（中国）商务部统计显示我们获得了其中约30%——不是因为我们在新加坡有基础设施项目，而是因为这些投资来到新加坡，然后最终被导向亚洲第三国，因为我们是一个相关的金融中心。

因此，我们做得并不差。但我们也不应自满。如果我们自满，30%可能会下降，其他竞争中心会兴起，把业务从我们这里拿走。我们必须努力工作，在金融方面、在专业服务方面、在基础设施方面，以及吸引中国企业以新加坡为基地。这是政府必须做的，我们也将鼓励新加坡企业自身思考如何作为中国企业的伙伴增加价值。

问：论坛上有新加坡公司吗？

部长：有的。它们已经与中国公司有合作伙伴关系。我们的基础设施企业、公用事业企业可以受益，其中许多已经有中国合作伙伴，我们鼓励它们继续加强这些伙伴关系。做到这一点的关键是保持相关性——我们的公司需要努力工作并更具创新性，以增加价值，并表明它们在与中国公司合作时能够提供良好的价值主张。

问：您能否谈谈竞争，因为世界其他地方正发展成为交通枢纽、基础设施枢纽，而这些曾经是新加坡的优势？

部长：我们不应害怕竞争。我们应坦然面对。如果我们没有把某些事情做对，新加坡本可能轻易失败。但我们能够在整个历史中克服困难。这应给我们信心，我们能够面对未来的竞争。我们不应害怕它；我们应对自己的能力、对自己的机智与创新能力有信心。已经可以看到，我们的规划中，我们正在投入大量额外投资以扩建机场和海港。我们正在使机场容量翻倍，实际上是在再建一个樟宜机场；我们正在使海港容量翻倍；这将使我们的两个港口——海港与空港——在未来更加具有相关性。

我们正在使新加坡不仅成为空运与海运枢纽，也成为数字枢纽。展望未来，数字数据将是新的资产。人们把它比作新的石油。正如我们是石油枢纽，尽管我们没有石油资源，未来我们希望成为数据枢纽、数字枢纽。这就是为什么我们也在投入基础设施以增强我们的信息通信技术基础设施——通过海底电缆与其他国家的连接，以及我们自身面向智慧国的内部基础设施。

我们没有原地踏步，也负担不起原地踏步。存在竞争。但我们应坦然面对，我们应有信心，我们应继续所有这些努力，以确保我们能够拥有安全的未来。其中许多事项已由未来经济委员会（CFE）讨论，我们现在正在落实相关建议。