# HDB Prices Are Falling While Condo Prices Rise — But Upgraders Have A Bigger Problem

- **Source:** Stacked Homes
- **Published:** 2026-08-16T13:16:40.000Z
- **Author:** Ryan J. Ong
- **Original:** https://stackedhomes.com/hdb-prices-are-falling-while-condo-prices-rise-but-upgraders-have-a-bigger-problem/
- **Topics:** HDB & Public Housing, Private Residential, Transactions & Deals

## Featured rationale

The widening absolute price gap may make condominium upgrades less affordable for HDB owners, potentially accelerating purchases among buyers facing rising land costs or limited unit availability.

## AI summary

In 2Q2026, HDB resale prices fell 0.3% q-o-q for a third consecutive quarter, while private residential prices rose 0.5% for a seventh consecutive quarter.

## Original article

The widening price gap between the HDB housing market and the private residential market made headlines recently, with observers noting that the two housing markets may start pulling in separate directions.

In 2Q2026, the HDB resale price index fell by 0.3% q-o-q. That’s not a very substantial figure, but it was significant because it was the third straight quarterly decline. On the other hand, private residential prices rose by 0.5% q-o-q during the same period. Thus, the private housing market has been growing for seven consecutive quarters.

This price growth is important because we generally expect both the public and private residential markets to move in tandem. That’s not to say their prices are in lockstep mind you, just that generally speaking, when one rises the other tends to go up as well, and vice versa.

This is the pattern of price movement that we’re used to seeing.

When we don’t see this pattern – such as recently when HDB prices dipped but private property prices rose – there’s a chance that it could fuel a ‘Fear Of Missing Out’ (FOMO) effect. As a result, there’s a chance that some HDB upgraders start to worry that, as average flat prices fall but average condo prices rise, it will be harder for them to sell their properties and bridge the price gap.

NUS Provost’s Chair Professor of Real Estate Tien Foo Sing recently argued that these fears may be overblown. He makes a strong point that property price movements of less than a year (three quarters in this case) shouldn’t be mistaken as a big structural change. And to be fair, I do see the merits of his point.

Actually, there have been several periods in the past when HDB and private property prices moved in different directions. But each time the two housing markets fell back into balance.

For example, the HDB resale price index stood at 77.1 at the end of 2004. By the end of 2006, it was around 2.9% below its end-2004 level. Meanwhile, private residential prices rose by around 3.9% in 2005 and another 10% in 2006. So over those two years, private property prices rose by roughly 14%, while HDB resale prices remained below where they had started.

A similar pattern also appeared recently. HDB resale prices fell by about 1.5% in 2017, followed by another decline of around 0.9% in 2018 (see the same link above).

On the other hand, private residential prices rose by 1.1% in 2017 and then jumped by another 7.9% in 2018. Over those two years, HDB resale prices fell by around 2.4%, while private residential prices rose by roughly 9%.

In both cases, HDB prices subsequently recovered. So it absolutely is true that three quarters of divergence is a bit early to panic.

But that being said, the markets don’t need to decouple for an aspiring upgrader to feel priced out.

Consider an HDB owner with a flat worth $700,000, and who hopes to upgrade to a $1.5 million condo. The initial price gap to achieve this property upgrade is about $800,000.

Now suppose the price of both properties rise by exactly 10%. The price of the HDB flat appreciates from $700,000 to $770,000, a gain of $70,000. The price of the condo rises from $1.5 million to $1.65 million, a gain of $150,000.

Both HDB and private markets have moved by exactly the same percentage, but the real gap has widened from $800,000 to $880,000. There was no need for any so-called ‘decoupling’ between the two housing markets for this upgrader to be potentially priced out.

Or if you want to flip it: If a $1.5 million condo rises by 10%, it gains $150,000 in value. So for a $700,000 HDB flat to gain the same $150,000, it would need to appreciate by around 21.4%. Overall, it suggests that the HDB market needs to do much more than just stay in tandem with the private residential market for upgraders to maintain their shot at affording a condo.

This is also why I’m less convinced that today’s urgency is simply “fear-based”

Professor Tien also warns that fears of decoupling could encourage fear-driven buying. Some households may be rushing into the private property market because they believe they’ll otherwise be priced out.

I agree that this can happen. There are always some FOMO cases in the property market (or arguably, any market at all). This could result in some buyers making poor decisions, especially the ones with a fixed belief that prices of any property will always rise.

But I think there’s also a danger in treating all urgency as irrational. The first reason is what I’ve already highlighted above: even if both HDB and private markets are largely in tandem, upgraders can struggle in terms of the absolute quantums involved.

The other reason is that buyers today are much more informed compared to buyers in the past, and their purchase concerns may be entirely rational.

Case in point, Lentor Garden Residences. Even before Lentor Gardens Residences launched, buyers already knew that the subsequent Lentor Central site had been acquired at a substantially higher land rate.

The site that would be developed into Lentor Gardens Residences was acquired for around $920 psf ppr, while the subsequent plot attracted a top bid of around $1,278 psf ppr. That’s almost 39% higher. Buyers didn’t need to believe that “property prices always go up” to conclude that the next comparable development was unlikely to be cheaper.

River Modern provides another interesting example. When it launched in March 2026, its site had been acquired by GuocoLand for around $1,420 psf ppr. At the time, buyers were made aware that another River Valley GLS site was due to be tendered, and that land prices were trending upwards.

(And yes, we were also one of those who sounded off on this issue. Timothy’s launch-weekend report specifically connected River Modern’s strong sales to the upcoming Parcel C and rising land prices. We also pointed to GLS land prices being on an upward trajectory, citing the then-recent $1,278 psf ppr Lentor Central bid.)

River Modern went on to sell around 90% of its 455 units during its launch weekend, at an average price of about $3,266 psf. Was this FOMO?

Well, the neighbouring River Valley Green Parcel C attracted a top bid of $1,730 psf ppr when it closed in June 2026. This was 21.8% higher than the $1,420 psf ppr paid for River Modern’s site.

The new parcel is also expected to be the last GLS site in the immediate River Valley vicinity for at least the next few years. So I wouldn’t consider the buyers irrational, for the rush, as their argument for buying clearly had legs.

There are also other, more micro-reasons why buyers today perceive scarcity.

An example of this can be seen among condos with only one or two residential towers. In these instances, failing to rush for a unit could mean that the next alternative is several floors up, and that could mean some buyers face being priced out.

And in the resale market, there’s even less certainty when another unit with the right layout, facing, floor and price will be listed. In these cases, urgency is not necessarily based on FOMO or the belief that prices will rise. It may simply be true that not rushing means not getting a unit. There are also some other reasons we’ve covered here, such as the unit mix.

Sometimes, the most viable and affordable options means there are only a limited number of the two-bedder or three-bedders. If you decide to wait, you had best be prepared to buy elsewhere altogether, especially if the bulk of buyers rush for those units first.

In my experience, these highly localised and specific reasons are why most buyers are often in a rush to close a deal. We don’t often hear that a buyer is rushing because “HDB prices are not in tandem with private prices” or some other such abstract reason. Those types of buyers do exist, but I haven’t experienced them making up the majority.

I do wonder if sometimes, this can get conflated with FOMO when viewed through the lens of wider market data.

The divergence in price that really matters is that of the lived experience and aggregate market data.

For someone who needs a three-bedder, and who watched the quantum climb to $2 million or above in the past few years, there’s little relief in knowing that HDB and private prices might move in tandem again. The panic is real, when their main asset is a four-room flat still hovering at $700,000.

The same goes for someone watching the only viable replacement units climb in price. It’s not FOMO on their part if they’re watching prices tick past their budget in real time, so to speak.

So, while I fully agree that you need to buy within your means, I don’t believe we should swing too far to the opposite direction as well. There’s a need to acknowledge two things: first, if you wait too long, there’s a chance you could be priced out of the specific unit you had in mind.

It doesn’t matter what the wider market numbers are if buyers can’t find a three-bedder near School X in neighbourhood Y at their budget. It’s not always FOMO when you really can get priced out, and sometimes you can see this happen in the context of rising land prices or unit availability.

Next, we need to accept that being priced out can happen, even if we “did everything right”. You may not have given in to FOMO – you may have bought at a fair price, researched the future land plots, saved as aggressively as possible, and yet still find your upgrade is out of reach. That’s not a failure on your part, it’s just something that happens.

And just in case it does, we should buy as if there may be no chance to upgrade. That’s regardless of how rosy or ugly the wider market looks.

Meanwhile in other property news…

Tiong Bahru is one of Singapore’s most iconic neighbourhoods; but it used to be a swamp lined with graves. Here’s how a largely unplanned, and very unexpected, transformation took place.

Did you know Singapore had rent control twice, and the last time it lasted around 62 years? Here’s how that post-WWII quirk also ended up helping to conserve our historical shophouses.

Bishan is an established hot spot, but the top performing condo for two-bedder units might surprise you. It’s actually this project closer to Sin Ming, rather than being in the heart of Bishan.

Weekly Sales Roundup (03 – 09 August)

Top 5 Most Expensive New Sales (By Project)

PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE

ELTA | $4,190,000 | 1776 | $2,359 | 99 yrs (2024)

DUNEARN HOUSE | $3,880,000 | 1184 | $3,277 | 99 yrs

CHUAN PARK | $3,356,500 | 1206 | $2,784 | 99 yrs (2024)

ARINA EAST RESIDENCES | $3,268,000 | 1087 | $3,006 | FH

LENTOR GARDENS RESIDENCES | $3,215,800 | 1346 | $2,390 | 99 yrs (2025)

Top 5 Cheapest New Sales (By Project)

PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE

UNION SQUARE RESIDENCES | $1,432,000.00 | 506 | $2,831.00 | 99 yrs (2024)

NARRA RESIDENCES | $1,495,000.00 | 721 | $2,073.00 | 99 yrs (2025)

VELA BAY | $1,537,000.00 | 484 | $3,173.00 | 99 yrs (2025)

DUNEARN HOUSE | $1,575,000.00 | 527 | $2,986.00 | 99 yrs

LENTOR GARDENS RESIDENCES | $1,579,100.00 | 646 | $2,445.00 | 99 yrs (2025)

Top 5 Most Expensive Resale

PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE

NOUVEL 18 | $6,600,000 | 1862 | $3,544 | FH

RIVERGATE | $6,360,000 | 1938 | $3,283 | FH

WATERFALL GARDENS | $5,620,000 | 2196 | $2,559 | FH

LEONIE PARC VIEW | $5,450,000 | 2013 | $2,708 | FH

REGENCY PARK | $5,330,000 | 2260 | $2,358 | FH

Top 5 Cheapest Resale

PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE

THE INFLORA | $650,000 | 463 | $1,404 | 99 yrs (2012)

THE INTERWEAVE | $660,000 | 388 | $1,703 | FH

THE VUE | $678,000 | 420 | $1,615 | FH

PRESTIGE HEIGHTS | $680,000 | 409 | $1,662 | FH

THE GREENWICH | $810,000 | 603 | $1,344 | 99 yrs (2009)

Top 5 Biggest Winners

PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | RETURNS | HOLDING PERIOD

OCEAN PARK | $4,280,000 | 2110 | $2,029 | $2,930,000 | 29 Years

RIVERGATE | $4,670,000 | 1507 | $3,099 | $2,885,300 | 20 Years

RIVERGATE | $6,360,000 | 1938 | $3,283 | $2,330,000 | 9 Years

WATERFALL GARDENS | $5,620,000 | 2196 | $2,559 | $2,220,000 | 11 Years

PALM SPRING | $4,580,000 | 2121 | $2,160 | $2,162,000 | 30 Years

Top 5 Biggest Losers

PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | RETURNS | HOLDING PERIOD

MARINA BAY SUITES | $2,750,000 | 1572 | $1,750 | -$1,043,000 | 16 Years

MARINA ONE RESIDENCES | $3,325,000 | 1539 | $2,160 | -$175,000 | 8 Years

SIXTEEN35 RESIDENCES | $1,005,000 | 753 | $1,334 | -$133,000 | 3 Years

MIRO | $2,200,000 | 1249 | $1,762 | -$100,000 | 16 Years

MEYER MANSION | $2,020,000 | 689 | $2,932 | -$85,600 | 4 Years

Top 5 Biggest Winners (ROI%)

PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | ROI (%) | HOLDING PERIOD

HILLINGTON GREEN | $2,588,888 | 1528 | $1,694 | 228% | 23 Years

OCEAN PARK | $4,280,000 | 2110 | $2,029 | 217% | 29 Years

BUTTERWORTH 8 | $2,652,888 | 1313 | $2,020 | 199% | 25 Years

STRATFORD COURT | $2,060,000 | 1938 | $1,063 | 197% | 22 Years

PALM GARDENS | $1,000,000 | 958 | $1,044 | 174% | 28 Years

Top 5 Biggest Losers (ROI%)

PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | ROI (%) | HOLDING PERIOD

MARINA BAY SUITES | $2,750,000 | 1572 | $1,750 | -28% | 16 Years

SIXTEEN35 RESIDENCES | $1,005,000 | 753 | $1,334 | -12% | 3 Years

MARINA ONE RESIDENCES | $3,325,000 | 1539 | $2,160 | -5% | 8 Years

VIDA | $1,085,000 | 517 | $2,100 | -5% | 9 Years

MIRO | $2,200,000 | 1249 | $1,762 | -4% | 16 Years

Transaction Breakdown

Follow us on Stacked for news and updates on the Singapore property market

## Chinese translation

> Translation model: openai_codex_cli

### HDB价格下跌而公寓价格上涨——但升级置业者面临更大的问题

HDB住房市场与私人住宅市场之间不断扩大的价格差距最近成为新闻焦点，观察人士指出，这两个住房市场可能开始朝不同方向发展。2026年第2季度，HDB转售价格指数环比下跌……

HDB住房市场与私人住宅市场之间不断扩大的价格差距最近成为新闻焦点，观察人士指出，这两个住房市场可能开始朝不同方向发展。

2026年第2季度，HDB转售价格指数环比下跌0.3%。这并不是一个非常大的数字，但它很重要，因为这是连续第三个季度下跌。另一方面，同期私人住宅价格环比上涨0.5%。因此，私人住宅市场已经连续七个季度增长。

这种价格增长很重要，因为我们通常预期公共和私人住宅市场会同步变动。请注意，这并不是说它们的价格完全一致，只是一般而言，当一个上涨时，另一个往往也会上涨，反之亦然。

这是我们习惯看到的价格走势模式。

当我们没有看到这种模式时——例如最近HDB价格下跌但私人房地产价格上涨——就有可能助长一种“错失恐惧”（FOMO）效应。因此，一些HDB升级置业者可能开始担心，随着平均组屋价格下跌但平均公寓价格上涨，他们将更难出售自己的房产并弥合价格差距。

新加坡国立大学房地产讲席教授田富兴最近认为，这些担忧可能被夸大了。他提出了一个有力观点，即少于一年的房地产价格走势（本例中为三个季度）不应被误认为是重大的结构性变化。公平地说，我确实看到了他观点中的合理之处。

事实上，过去曾有几个时期，HDB和私人房地产价格朝不同方向变动。但每一次，两个住房市场都会重新回到平衡。

例如，HDB转售价格指数在2004年底为77.1。到2006年底，它比2004年底的水平低约2.9%。与此同时，私人住宅价格在2005年上涨约3.9%，并在2006年再上涨10%。因此在这两年里，私人房地产价格上涨了约14%，而HDB转售价格仍低于起点水平。

最近也出现了类似模式。HDB转售价格在2017年下跌约1.5%，随后在2018年又下跌约0.9%（见上方同一链接）。

另一方面，私人住宅价格在2017年上涨1.1%，随后在2018年又跃升7.9%。在这两年里，HDB转售价格下跌约2.4%，而私人住宅价格上涨约9%。

在这两种情况下，HDB价格随后都恢复了。因此，三季度的分化确实有点太早，不必恐慌。

但话虽如此，市场并不需要脱钩，就足以让有意升级置业的人感觉自己被价格挤出市场。

设想一名HDB业主拥有一套价值新币700,000元的组屋，并希望升级到一套新币1.5 million元的公寓。实现这次房产升级的初始价格差约为新币800,000元。

现在假设两套房产的价格都正好上涨10%。HDB组屋价格从新币700,000元升值到新币770,000元，增值新币70,000元。公寓价格从新币1.5 million元上涨到新币1.65 million元，增值新币150,000元。

HDB和私人市场的涨幅百分比完全相同，但实际差距已经从新币800,000元扩大到新币880,000元。对这名升级置业者来说，两个住房市场之间并不需要出现所谓的“脱钩”，也可能被价格挤出市场。

或者如果你想反过来看：如果一套新币1.5 million元的公寓上涨10%，其价值增加新币150,000元。因此，一套新币700,000元的HDB组屋若要获得同样的新币150,000元增值，就需要升值约21.4%。总体来看，这表明HDB市场需要做的远不只是与私人住宅市场保持同步，升级置业者才有机会维持负担得起公寓的可能性。

这也是为什么我不太相信今天的紧迫感只是“基于恐惧”。

田教授也警告，脱钩担忧可能会鼓励受恐惧驱动的购房。一些家庭可能因为相信否则自己会被价格挤出市场，而急于进入私人房地产市场。

我同意这种情况可能发生。房地产市场中总会有一些FOMO案例（或者可以说，任何市场都是如此）。这可能导致一些买家作出糟糕决定，尤其是那些坚信任何房产价格都会永远上涨的人。

但我认为，把所有紧迫感都视为非理性也有危险。第一个原因就是我上面已经强调的：即使HDB和私人市场大体同步，升级置业者仍可能在绝对金额方面面临困难。

另一个原因是，与过去的买家相比，今天的买家了解的信息要多得多，他们的购房顾虑可能完全是理性的。

Lentor Garden Residences就是一个例子。甚至在Lentor Gardens Residences推出之前，买家已经知道随后Lentor Central地块的成交地价显著更高。

后来发展为Lentor Gardens Residences的地块以约每平方英尺楼面价新币920元购得，而随后一幅地块的最高出价约为每平方英尺楼面价新币1,278元。这几乎高出39%。买家不需要相信“房价总会上涨”，也能得出下一个可比项目不太可能更便宜的结论。

River Modern提供了另一个有趣例子。它在2026年3月推出时，其地块由GuocoLand以约每平方英尺楼面价新币1,420元购得。当时，买家被告知另一幅River Valley政府售地（GLS）地块即将招标，而且地价正呈上升趋势。

（是的，我们也是当时就这个问题发声的人之一。Timothy的开盘周末报告明确将River Modern的强劲销售与即将推出的Parcel C和上涨的地价联系起来。我们也指出GLS地价正处于上升轨道，并引用了当时近期Lentor Central每平方英尺楼面价新币1,278元的出价。）

River Modern随后在开盘周末售出其455个单位中的约90%，平均价格约为每平方英尺新币3,266元。这是FOMO吗？

嗯，邻近的River Valley Green Parcel C在2026年6月截标时吸引了每平方英尺楼面价新币1,730元的最高出价。这比River Modern地块支付的每平方英尺楼面价新币1,420元高出21.8%。

新地块预计也将是至少未来几年内River Valley周边近处的最后一幅GLS地块。因此，我不会因为买家抢购就认为他们不理性，因为他们的购买论点显然站得住脚。

今天的买家感知到稀缺，还有其他更微观的原因。

一个例子可以在只有一两栋住宅楼的公寓项目中看到。在这些情况下，如果不赶紧抢一个单位，下一个替代选择可能就在高出好几层的位置，而这可能意味着一些买家面临被价格挤出市场。

而在转售市场中，何时会有另一套布局、朝向、楼层和价格都合适的单位挂牌，确定性甚至更低。在这些情况下，紧迫感不一定基于FOMO或相信价格会上涨。事实可能只是，不赶紧出手就买不到单位。我们也在这里讨论过其他一些原因，例如单位组合。

有时候，最可行且负担得起的选择意味着两房或三房单位数量有限。如果你决定等待，最好准备好完全去别处购买，尤其是在大多数买家先抢购这些单位的情况下。

根据我的经验，这些高度本地化且具体的原因，才是大多数买家经常急于成交的原因。我们并不常听到买家因为“HDB价格没有与私人价格同步”或其他这类抽象原因而急于购买。这类买家确实存在，但我没有经历过他们构成多数的情况。

我确实想知道，有时从更广泛市场数据的视角来看，这是否会被混同为FOMO。

真正重要的价格分化，是生活体验与总体市场数据之间的分化。

对于需要三房单位、并在过去几年看着总价攀升到新币2 million元或以上的人来说，知道HDB和私人价格可能再次同步，并不会带来多少慰藉。当他们的主要资产是一套仍徘徊在新币700,000元的四房式组屋时，恐慌是真实的。

对于看着唯一可行的替代单位价格上涨的人来说，也是一样。可以这么说，如果他们正在实时看到价格越过自己的预算，那就不是他们的FOMO。

因此，虽然我完全同意你需要在自己能力范围内购买，但我也不认为我们应该过度摆向相反方向。我们需要承认两件事：首先，如果你等得太久，你可能会被你心中那个具体单位的价格挤出市场。

如果买家无法在自己的预算内，在Y邻里、X学校附近找到一套三房单位，那么更广泛的市场数字是什么并不重要。当你确实可能被价格挤出市场时，这并不总是FOMO，而且有时候你可以在地价上涨或单位供应的背景下看到这种情况发生。

其次，我们需要接受，即使我们“做对了一切”，仍可能被价格挤出市场。你可能没有屈服于FOMO——你可能以公平价格购买、研究了未来地块、尽可能积极储蓄，但仍发现升级置业遥不可及。这不是你的失败，只是会发生的事情。

而以防这种情况真的发生，我们应该以可能没有机会升级的心态来买房。无论更广泛市场看起来多么乐观或糟糕，都是如此。

与此同时，其他房地产新闻……

Tiong Bahru是新加坡最具标志性的社区之一；但它过去是一片排列着坟墓的沼泽。以下是一个很大程度上未经规划、也非常出人意料的转型如何发生的过程。

你知道新加坡曾两次实施租金管制，而且最近一次持续了约62年吗？以下是二战后这一特殊现象如何最终也帮助保留我们的历史店屋。

Bishan是一个成熟热点，但两房单位表现最佳的公寓可能会让你惊讶。它其实是这个更靠近Sin Ming的项目，而不是位于Bishan核心地段。

每周销售汇总（03 – 09 August）

最贵新销售前5名（按项目）

项目名称 | 价格 S$ | 面积（平方英尺） | 每平方英尺价格 | 地契

ELTA | 新币4,190,000元 | 1776 | 新币2,359元 | 99年（2024）

DUNEARN HOUSE | 新币3,880,000元 | 1184 | 新币3,277元 | 99年

CHUAN PARK | 新币3,356,500元 | 1206 | 新币2,784元 | 99年（2024）

ARINA EAST RESIDENCES | 新币3,268,000元 | 1087 | 新币3,006元 | 永久地契

LENTOR GARDENS RESIDENCES | 新币3,215,800元 | 1346 | 新币2,390元 | 99年（2025）

最便宜新销售前5名（按项目）

项目名称 | 价格 S$ | 面积（平方英尺） | 每平方英尺价格 | 地契

UNION SQUARE RESIDENCES | 新币1,432,000.00元 | 506 | 新币2,831.00元 | 99年（2024）

NARRA RESIDENCES | 新币1,495,000.00元 | 721 | 新币2,073.00元 | 99年（2025）

VELA BAY | 新币1,537,000.00元 | 484 | 新币3,173.00元 | 99年（2025）

DUNEARN HOUSE | 新币1,575,000.00元 | 527 | 新币2,986.00元 | 99年

LENTOR GARDENS RESIDENCES | 新币1,579,100.00元 | 646 | 新币2,445.00元 | 99年（2025）

最贵转售前5名

项目名称 | 价格 S$ | 面积（平方英尺） | 每平方英尺价格 | 地契

NOUVEL 18 | 新币6,600,000元 | 1862 | 新币3,544元 | 永久地契

RIVERGATE | 新币6,360,000元 | 1938 | 新币3,283元 | 永久地契

WATERFALL GARDENS | 新币5,620,000元 | 2196 | 新币2,559元 | 永久地契

LEONIE PARC VIEW | 新币5,450,000元 | 2013 | 新币2,708元 | 永久地契

REGENCY PARK | 新币5,330,000元 | 2260 | 新币2,358元 | 永久地契

最便宜转售前5名

项目名称 | 价格 S$ | 面积（平方英尺） | 每平方英尺价格 | 地契

THE INFLORA | 新币650,000元 | 463 | 新币1,404元 | 99年（2012）

THE INTERWEAVE | 新币660,000元 | 388 | 新币1,703元 | 永久地契

THE VUE | 新币678,000元 | 420 | 新币1,615元 | 永久地契

PRESTIGE HEIGHTS | 新币680,000元 | 409 | 新币1,662元 | 永久地契

THE GREENWICH | 新币810,000元 | 603 | 新币1,344元 | 99年（2009）

最大赢家前5名

项目名称 | 价格 S$ | 面积（平方英尺） | 每平方英尺价格 | 回报 | 持有期

OCEAN PARK | 新币4,280,000元 | 2110 | 新币2,029元 | 新币2,930,000元 | 29年

RIVERGATE | 新币4,670,000元 | 1507 | 新币3,099元 | 新币2,885,300元 | 20年

RIVERGATE | 新币6,360,000元 | 1938 | 新币3,283元 | 新币2,330,000元 | 9年

WATERFALL GARDENS | 新币5,620,000元 | 2196 | 新币2,559元 | 新币2,220,000元 | 11年

PALM SPRING | 新币4,580,000元 | 2121 | 新币2,160元 | 新币2,162,000元 | 30年

最大输家前5名

项目名称 | 价格 S$ | 面积（平方英尺） | 每平方英尺价格 | 回报 | 持有期

MARINA BAY SUITES | 新币2,750,000元 | 1572 | 新币1,750元 | -新币1,043,000元 | 16年

MARINA ONE RESIDENCES | 新币3,325,000元 | 1539 | 新币2,160元 | -新币175,000元 | 8年

SIXTEEN35 RESIDENCES | 新币1,005,000元 | 753 | 新币1,334元 | -新币133,000元 | 3年

MIRO | 新币2,200,000元 | 1249 | 新币1,762元 | -新币100,000元 | 16年

MEYER MANSION | 新币2,020,000元 | 689 | 新币2,932元 | -新币85,600元 | 4年

最大赢家前5名（ROI%）

项目名称 | 价格 S$ | 面积（平方英尺） | 每平方英尺价格 | ROI（%） | 持有期

HILLINGTON GREEN | 新币2,588,888元 | 1528 | 新币1,694元 | 228% | 23年

OCEAN PARK | 新币4,280,000元 | 2110 | 新币2,029元 | 217% | 29年

BUTTERWORTH 8 | 新币2,652,888元 | 1313 | 新币2,020元 | 199% | 25年

STRATFORD COURT | 新币2,060,000元 | 1938 | 新币1,063元 | 197% | 22年

PALM GARDENS | 新币1,000,000元 | 958 | 新币1,044元 | 174% | 28年

最大输家前5名（ROI%）

项目名称 | 价格 S$ | 面积（平方英尺） | 每平方英尺价格 | ROI（%） | 持有期

MARINA BAY SUITES | 新币2,750,000元 | 1572 | 新币1,750元 | -28% | 16年

SIXTEEN35 RESIDENCES | 新币1,005,000元 | 753 | 新币1,334元 | -12% | 3年

MARINA ONE RESIDENCES | 新币3,325,000元 | 1539 | 新币2,160元 | -5% | 8年

VIDA | 新币1,085,000元 | 517 | 新币2,100元 | -5% | 9年

MIRO | 新币2,200,000元 | 1249 | 新币1,762元 | -4% | 16年

交易细分

关注Stacked，获取新加坡房地产市场新闻与最新动态